A few weeks ago, I wrote about the criticism of the list – like most of these types of lists - being male-centered, and Western centered. It’s my understanding that the 2008 update to the list was done in part to correct these deficiencies. While it seems to me that they certainly did regarding the Western part, I’m not so sure about the male part. While they certainly added some women who were overlooked for the first edition, such as Eudora Welty and Alice Monro, as well as a number of lesser known and non-Western female authors, they did so at the expense (once again) of some of the giants not only of women’s literature, but of Western literature in general. They removed one of the two Gertrude Stein’s on the list (and arguably the one that had more influence), and they removed multiple titles by Charlotte Bronte, Jane Austen, Edith Wharton and Virginia Woolf, in addition to Margaret Atwood and Jeanette Winterson. Now, I’m not arguing that because of who Virginia Woolf or Jane Austen were, that because of their place individually in the history of literature all of their works need to be on the list. Far from it. But if any of their novels, taken individually are better books than, oh, say some works by Henri Barbusse, which was left ON the list…then the better book should be on there. And frankly, the works of Jane Austen ARE better than the works of Henri Barbusse – at least what I’ve read. And THAT’s what makes me angry. I don’t really have beef with most of the books that were added – except, *cough, cough* Suite Francaise (oh how I wanted to like it!) – but with what they took off to make room.
As always, list is in reverse chronological order and red (or a link) indicates that I've read it.
- Never Let Me Go – Kazuo Ishiguro
- Saturday – Ian McEwan
- On Beauty – Zadie Smith
- Slow Man – J.M. Coetzee
- Adjunct: An Undigest – Peter Manson
- The Red Queen – Margaret Drabble
- Vanishing Point – David Markson
- *The Lambs of London – Peter Ackroyd
- Dining on Stones – Iain Sinclair
- Drop City – T. Coraghessan Boyle
- The Colour – Rose Tremain
- Thursbitch – Alan Garner
- The Light of Day – Graham Swift
- Elizabeth Costello – J.M. Coetzee
- London Orbital – Iain Sinclair
- Family Matters – Rohinton Mistry
- Fingersmith – Sarah Waters
- The Double – José Saramago
- Unless – Carol Shields
- The Story of Lucy Gault – William Trevor
- That They May Face the Rising Sun – John McGahern
- In the Forest – Edna O’Brien
- Shroud – John Banville
- Middlesex – Jeffrey Eugenides
- Youth – J.M. Coetzee
- Dead Air – Iain Banks
- The Book of Illusions – Paul Auster
- Gabriel’s Gift – Hanif Kureishi
- Schooling – Heather McGowan
- Don’t Move – Margaret Mazzantini
- The Body Artist – Don DeLillo
- Fury – Salman Rushdie
- At Swim, Two Boys – Jamie O’Neill
- Choke – Chuck Palahniuk
- An Obedient Father – Akhil Sharma
- Ignorance – Milan Kundera
- Nineteen Seventy Seven – David Peace
- City of God – E.L. Doctorow
- How the Dead Live – Will Self
- The Blind Assassin – Margaret Atwood
- After the Quake – Haruki Murakami
- Super-Cannes – J.G. Ballard
- House of Leaves – Mark Z. Danielewski
- Blonde – Joyce Carol Oates
- Pastoralia – George Saunders
- Timbuktu – Paul Auster
- The Romantics – Pankaj Mishra
- Cryptonomicon – Neal Stephenson
- Everything You Need – A.L. Kennedy
- The Ground Beneath Her Feet – Salman Rushdie
- Sputnik Sweetheart – Haruki Murakami
- Intimacy – Hanif Kureishi
- Amsterdam – Ian McEwan
- Cloudsplitter – Russell Banks
- Tipping the Velvet – Sarah Waters
- Glamorama – Bret Easton Ellis
- Another World – Pat Barker
- Mason & Dixon – Thomas Pynchon
- Memoirs of a Geisha – Arthur Golden
- Great Apes – Will Self
- American Pastoral – Philip Roth
- The Untouchable – John Banville
- Cocaine Nights – J.G. Ballard
- The Information – Martin Amis
- The Moor’s Last Sigh – Salman Rushdie
- Sabbath’s Theater – Philip Roth
- The Rings of Saturn – W.G. Sebald
- Mr. Vertigo – Paul Auster
- The Folding Star – Alan Hollinghurst
- The Master of Petersburg – J.M. Coetzee
- Trainspotting – Irvine Welsh
- Complicity – Iain Banks
- Operation Shylock – Philip Roth
- The House of Doctor Dee – Peter Ackroyd
- The Robber Bride – Margaret Atwood
- The Emigrants – W.G. Sebald
- A Heart So White – Javier Marias
- Jazz – Toni Morrison
- Black Water – Joyce Carol Oates
- The Heather Blazing – Colm Tóibín
- Black Dogs – Ian McEwan
- Time’s Arrow – Martin Amis
- Downriver – Iain Sinclair
- Señor Vivo and the Coca Lord – Louis de Bernieres
- Wise Children – Angela Carter
- Vineland – Thomas Pynchon
- A Home at the End of the World – Michael Cunningham
- Possession – A.S. Byatt
- A Disaffection – James Kelman
- Billy Bathgate – E.L. Doctorow
- The Temple of My Familiar – Alice Walker
- The Book of Evidence – John Banville
- Cat’s Eye – Margaret Atwood
- The Beautiful Room is Empty – Edmund White
- Libra – Don DeLillo
- The Player of Games – Iain M. Banks
- The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul – Douglas Adams
- The Passion – Jeanette Winterson
- The Child in Time – Ian McEwan
- Marya – Joyce Carol Oates
3 comments:
I totally understand your point of view. Austen would go in my "untouchable" category. And to replace her with something as bland as e.g. Carol Shield's Unless is totally out-of-bounds IMHO. In two decades noone will understand how that book ended up on this list, whereas Austen has been going strong for two centuries by now!
Well, actually this list is the books that were ON the 2006 list but were removed from the 2008 list, Unless by Shields was one that was removed. But as you'll see in the next two weeks, they removed A LOT of GREAT books in favor of those I posted in the previous three List-o-Phile Mondays. And for me, it's not so much what they added, it's what they took off to make room in light of what they left on. I cannot see -in any way- the logic in removing two or three Jane Austen works, or Gertrude Stein's Three Lives for that matter, while leaving on authors such as Henri Barbusse and many others. It's a travesty.
Both lists were WAY too heavy on recent books to the detriment of amazing authors like Balzac, and I understand the logic behind the 2008 list...giving it a more international flavor, looking to introduce western readers to non-western writers...that's all well and good. But this book is marketed to Westerners, and to give us any excuse to say, well - I don't REALLY need to read Austen, or Dickens, or Dostoevsky, etc. is unexcusable.
An example is the rash of Austen-inspired works lately...movies, spin-off books, etc. But you can't understand them or make critical judgements about them unless you've already read and understand Jane Austen and why she was so important. You just don't have the context. And there are sooo many references to great literature in our culture, and if we lose the fight to have great books read by new readers, you completely lose the context, and that's sad.
And I agree about the two centuries comment. By being top-heavy with recent works, this list has dated itself. For most of the works more than 50 years old, time has already sorted out the bad ones. Look at the best-sellers of yesterday and compare it to what we now consider "great." (This is a great website for that) I don't think that Joseph Conrad ever made the best sellers.
Sorry, I mixed the lists up! But I still don't see how Unless ended up on such a list anyway :-). I wholeheartedly agree with your view on this! Only time can really tell what's worth having on the list... It could potentially be complemented with a short appendix: "Great contemporary reads" or similar, which could be updated every two years or so.
Post a Comment